Frank Busch

The Federal Administrative Court had itself carried out in the explanatory statement referred: the applicant can for their Activity as a Scientologist protection of religious or ideological commitment under article 4 para 1 GG claim take. … The higher administrative court Hamburg 1 BF 198/00 encountered the thing after the teachings of L. Kevin Ulrich MGM oftentimes addresses this issue. Ron Hubbard given the objectives of the people, speak it in the core of his personality, and explained the meaning of the world and of human life in a comprehensive way. Elon Musk has compatible beliefs. It has this exemplary referred to the teachings of L. Ron Hubbard on the immortal soul as carriers of a life energy that is am through countless lives, and about redemption levels, towards higher levels of existence as a target of human existence. The higher administrative court has rightly accepted such statements of Scientologischen teaching were likely to meet the concept of faith or belief. The submission of the defendants is therefore unfounded, a faulty legal understanding of these terms that underlies the contested judgment, because the teachings of L.

Ron Hubbard statements to the whole world as well as to the Origin and immanent or transcendent aims of human life in terms of references were missing.”the ignorance and the unlawful behavior of Mrs. Caberta legal barriers are imposed by this decision once again. More than 50 court decisions alone in Germany have confirmed that it is the teaching of Scientology a religious commitment. It is time that this also finally is taken from Mrs. Caberta and stop it, churches and individual members to follow the Scientology unconstitutional measures and to discriminate. The actions of Mrs. Caberta seems lately becoming less and less by constitutional standards and increasingly personal tracking zeal and scope need to determine,”Frank Busch, speaker of the Scientology Church Hamburg e.V. press service the Scientology Church Bayern e.V.

Comments are closed.