Supreme Court

So put the weight of coexistence and the training in values in the fathers of families who do not have or may have the answers for their children. Sooner or later will come out family hatch, by many material comforts and few inconveniences that Yes require them in other areas: liability, compliance schedules and rules of coexistence. Either way, these positions have echoed the opposition in Spain and the Episcopal Conference. Together, they have starred in a crusade against the citizenship education course, with appeals for conscientious objection. But the Supreme Court decided in favor of the constitutionality of the subject, considered by his detractors as a threat to the moral values and the traditional family. The opposition also claims to an alleged hidden agenda of the totalitarian left that seeks to wash the consciences of citizens. Also resorted to the nostalgia for supposed best times in which, apparently, there were no acts of evil, violence was an exception, the family was United and all were happy.

Why they insist on study, analyze, diagnose and propose solutions for the issues of today with the tools of yesterday. Without wanting to, Manuel de Castro, general Secretary of the patron of Catholic schools in Spain, has defended the subject to distinguish between ethical values that affect the coexistence and that only affect the person. Questions of the family settings, training in civic values and solidarity, exposure to the diversity of people and the plurality of ideas affect the person and their social environment. More than concrete answers, education for citizenship aims to help young people to ask and to themselves respond to begin exercising responsible citizenship from an early age. That can perhaps distinguish moral ethics; This is limited to a cultural specific codes, while that is universal in its search and your questions.

Comments are closed.